Friday, October 29, 2010

Weekend Watching: Eastbound & Down

This is the penultimate episode of Eastbound & Down, Season 2 (HBO, Sunday 10:30 pm EDT).  I have to admit, I was a little surprised that my girlfriend was mad when she found out I was watching it without her.  I figured it was one of those shows I'd have to find time to watch on my own. 

HBO just announced that the show has been renewed for a third season.




Bonus: "Will Ferrell is Ashley Schaeffer for Ashley Schaeffer Motors. Come on down and you could meet baseball legend Kenny Powers!"


Thursday, October 28, 2010

Blake Griffin is already one of my favorite NBA players

Watch this first.

REMOVED

Now you know part of why Blake Griffin is one of my favorite NBA players after only one game in the league.  Ok, I watched him play a lot in college, so I knew what was coming.  Still, I made sure to stay up late to watch him finally make his debut in the NBA. 

Griffin was the #1 overall draft pick by the Clippers before last season and injured his knee, on a slam dunk, during a preseason game.  He missed all of last season, so this is his rookie year.  In addition to being one of the most athletic big guys you will ever see (he is listed at 6'10", 251 lbs.), Griffin plays good defense, boxes out, runs the floor, passes, and plays the game with energy.  And he makes highlight reel plays like the ones above.

Blake Griffin plays the way you would teach a young big man the game.  He acts like one of those marginal players that has to outwork everybody just to make the team, but he is actually the best player out there.  Opponents will get tired of having to deal with this guy on the court.  Hopefully that trait spreads to his teammates, and maybe the Clippers will become a decent team.

There aren't many basketball players like Blake Griffin.  He reminds me a little of what Len Bias might have been.

These highlights are only the beginning of a promising career.

Weekend Football Picks

College

KANSAS STATE +5.5 vs. Oklahoma State
Michigan State +6.5 vs. IOWA
Missouri +7.5 vs. NEBRASKA
GEORGIA -3 vs. Florida (at Jacksonville, FL.)
Auburn -7 vs. MISSISSIPPI
Oregon -7 vs. USC

Last week: 2-3
Overall: 13-16

NFL

Washington +2.5 vs. DETROIT
Green Bay +6 vs. NY JETS
ST. LOUIS -3 vs. Carolina
Jacksonville +7 vs. DALLAS
Kansas City -7.5 vs. BUFFALO
SAN FRANCISCO 0 vs. Denver (at London, England)
CINCINNATI 0 vs. Miami
Tennessee +4 vs. SAN DIEGO
Tampa Bay +3 vs. ARIZONA
Seattle +1 vs. OAKLAND
Minnesota +5.5 vs NEW ENGLAND
NEW ORLEANS 0 vs. Pittsburgh
INDIANAPOLIS -5.5 vs. Houston

Last week: 10-4
Overall: 44-25-2

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy

I'm a pretty popular person these days.  That's the impression you would get if you looked in my mailbox everyday.  Political candidates for every office, from Governor and Senator, to City Director and Justice of the Peace, are mailing me, asking for my vote.  While I am registered without a party affiliation, the national committee of the party I chose to vote with during the primary sent me a mailer reminding me to vote, and listing early voting locations.  They would probably give me a ride to the polling location if I asked nicely. 

Now I'm not particularly political, at least no more than the next person.  I vote, but I am not a serial voter.  It appears these mid-term elections (November 2, 2010) will have a large voter turnout.  Early voting and absentee voting have been high in my area.  Maybe there will be more than one other voter inside when I go to my polling location next Tuesday.  Selfishly, I hope not.

I don't want to post something that espouses views on issues, parties, or candidates.  I will, however, state a political opinion, on voting.

Monday, October 25, 2010

The College Football Guide to Scheduling a Homecoming Opponent

It's the time of year when universities around the country are celebrating homecoming weekend.  This involves alumni returning to school, seeing old friends, drinking copious amounts of alcohol, 30-somethings thinking they have a chance with college coeds (they do!), and occasionally donating to the alumni fund. 

Homecoming is often centered around a home game for the college football team.  For the school and alumni alike, it is an important event.  There are a few actions that the athletic department and football team can take in order to make the experience more enjoyable; namely schedule an appropriate opponent and win the game at all cost.  

Why aren't we playing Northwestern State?
(from SI.com)
It can be difficult for teams and athletic departments to choose an opponent that is right for them.  This is an example of what not to do.

UK drops 44-31 to Georgia

So, in honor of Kentucky's Homecoming FAIL of last weekend, it is recommended that all schools consult these guidelines, while determining possible exceptions to the rules, in order to schedule a homecoming opponent that is right for them.  In doing so, they will achieve their objective, winning the game.

With this in mind, I figure it's time to publish a theory that a friend and I created a few years back, called "The College Football Guide to Scheduling a Homecoming Opponent."

Poker Tip #5: Moving from the computer to the casino

Playing poker on the internet affords many advantages to a beginning player.  The most obvious benefit is that a player can gain experience quickly by seeing a lot of hands in a short amount of time.  One can play multiple tables, with little or no risk involved.  At some point, people get curious or have the opportunity and want play in a game at a casino.  If you have played online, in a home game, and know the basic rules, you have to take the leap sometime. 

This post is intended to highlight some things to consider when moving from the computer to the casino.

Friday, October 22, 2010

Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl

A few sketches from Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl.


"International Philosophy"




"Bruces' Philosophers Song"

Check This Out

Wondering if the game is going to be shown on tv in your area?  Check this out.  the506.com is "Everything you need to know about sports on television".  It includes listings by sport and color coded maps for NFL coverage. 

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Weekend Football Picks

College

Michigan State -5 vs. NORTHWESTERN
Notre Dame -7 vs. NAVY
Louisiana State (LSU) +6 vs. AUBURN
Wisconsin +6 vs. IOWA
Oklahoma -3 vs. MISSOURI

Last Week: 4-3
Overall: 11-13

NFL

San Francisco -2.5 vs. CAROLINA
KANSAS CITY -4.5 vs. Jacksonville
Cleveland +14 vs. NEW ORLEANS
TENNESSEE -3 vs. Philadelphia
Buffalo +14 vs. BALTIMORE
Washington +2.5 vs. CHICAGO
Pittsburgh -2.5 vs. MIAMI
St. Louis +3 vs. TAMPA BAY
ATLANTA -3 vs. Cincinnati
SEATTLE -5.5 vs. Arizona
DENVER -7 vs. Oakland
New England +3 vs. SAN DIEGO
GREEN BAY -1.5 vs. Minnesota
DALLAS -3 vs. New York Giants

Last Week: 10-3-1
Overall: 34-21-2

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Poker Tip #4: How much to bet

This post is intended to provide a basic structure for beginners who are trying to determine a proper amount to bet in common cash game situations. 

How much is the right amount to bet?  I have been asked this question a lot over the years, and unfortunately, there is not a standard answer that applies to all situations.  The right amount to bet depends on many factors.

First, let's ask, what do I want to happen as a result of my bet.

The correct amount to bet or raise will be the amount that will achieve the response I want from my opponent(s).  If I want opponent(s) to stay in the hand, by calling or raising, what is the correct (or the maximum) amount that will do that?  How much do I have to bet if I want my opponent(s) to fold, when I am protecting my hand from a draw or bluffing?

Notice I will often express the amount to bet in terms of percentage of the total pot.  Good poker players know at least roughly how much money is in the pot before they bet.  Try to incorporate knowing the pot value into Poker Tip #1: Follow the action.  Computer players have the amount calculated for them and often need to adjust to this aspect of a casino game - one reason why I prefer live action. 

Pre-flop

The minimum raise allowed pre-flop is the amount of the big blind, or the amount of the previous raise.  A standard raise before the flop in NL Texas Hold ‘Em is 3x – 6x the big blind, or the amount of previous raise, sometimes more.  A player can also go “all in”, meaning bet all their chips, at any time when it is their turn. 

Example #1:  If the big blind is $2, the minimum raise is another $2, making the total bet $4.  In a $1/$2 NL Texas Hold 'Em game, a typical raise is to $10 or $12.  In an unraised pot, it is my turn to act and I have AA.  I will probably raise to around $12, maybe more if a lot of people are calling bets.

Example #2:  In a $1/$2 NL game, a player raises to $10.  It is my turn to act and I have AA.  There are no other callers.  I will probably raise to around $30.

Example #3:  In a $1/$2 NL game, a player raises to $10.  Two people call.  It is my turn to act and I have AA.  I will probably raise to around $50-$60 and hope one person calls or re-raises.

If I or my opponent have a short stack (low on chips), I probably will move "all in" pre-flop in Example #2 and Example #3, perhaps also Example #1.

With all these examples, I gave us the best possible starting hand (AA), but I would certainly raise and re-raise with additional hands.  I only limp with big pocket pairs if I am confident there will be a raise behind me, allowing me to re-raise, or to trap an opponent.  Do not make a habit of limping with premium hands. 

After the flop

The minimum bet after the flop is the amount of the big blind ($2 in $1/$2 NL hold 'em).  I hardly ever make a minimum bet.  It is often a sign of weakness, and/or attempting to chase a hand (straight or flush draw) cheaply.  I will raise people who min-bet, to the total amount of the pot, sometimes more, if I have a strong hand (or not, if I think I can get them to fold their draw).  Make it statistically unfavorable for them to continue to chase cards. 

After the flop, a standard bet ranges from half to the full amount of the pot.  Betting half to 3/4 of the pot will encourage action, and may give multiple players statistical "pot odds" to call the bet.  Betting 3/4 or more than the pot is a strong bet, which may discourage all but the most serious callers.  An over-bet could also be interpreted as a bluff, made in attempt to have everybody fold, and steal the pot.

Raises after the flop depend upon the amount of the original bet, if there are any callers, and how much money is in the pot.  If I decide to raise someone who bets after the flop, my raise would probably be at least the total amount of the pot, sometimes more, or could be "all in". (see Example #5). 

Example #4:  I have Ah, 10c (ace of hearts, 10 of clubs) and the flop comes Ad, 9h, 10d (ace of diamonds, 9 of hearts, 10 of diamonds)  There is $25 in the pot.  I have top two pair and think my opponent could either have a pair of aces; maybe a straight or flush draw because there are possibilities for him to have four diamonds or four cards to a straight.  I want to protect my hand from these draws and think that if he has a pair of aces, he may call with an inferior hand to mine.  I bet $25, the amount of the pot.

Four examples:

What could your opponent hold in this situation?
Odds calculator available at http://www.cardplayer.com/

Example #5:  Same hand and flop.  I have Ah, 10c (ace of hearts, 10 of clubs) and the flop comes Ad, 9h, 10d (ace of diamonds, 9 of hearts, 10 of diamonds)  There is $25 in the pot.  An opponent bets $10 and everyone else folds.  I have top two pair and think my opponent either has a pair of aces, or more likely could have a straight or flush draw, since both possibilities exist.  I want to protect my hand from the draws and think that if he has a pair of aces, he may call with an inferior hand.  There is $35 in the pot.  So, I raise to $45, making the total amount in the pot to $80.  My opponent will have to call an additional $35 to stay in the hand.

If I have a short stack, I will be eager to go "all in" with top two pair on the flop.  I would force my opponent to go "all in" if he is short stacked.

As these hands plays out, perhaps my opponent folds a draw, or calls, showing an AK.  He has a strong pair of aces, but I have two pair, and win the pot. 

One note of caution:  I need to consider hands that could beat mine (99 would be bad for me), and decide to keep playing, or fold if I believe my opponent could hold the better hand.

So, betting and raising is situational, based upon many factors, including what you want to happen as a result of your bet.  Also the value of the pot, stack sizes, your opponents style of play, as well as other factors.

My next post will focus on things to consider (like counting the pot) when moving from internet to live poker. 

Sunday, October 17, 2010

How to eat unhealthy at home

I have thought about doing a recipes post here, so what better than to just link to other peoples work first?  I'll add a few of my own (and credit to my grandmother) sometime in the future.


Top 10 Fast Food Recipes You Can Make at Home

Friday, October 15, 2010

Weekend Watching

Not sure if I will actually watch this on tv Saturday night, but I programmed the DVR to record the new episode of That Metal Show, on VH1 Classic (Sat. 11:00pm EST ). 

That Metal Show is a real life Wayne's World, minus all the bad jokes.  Three old metal-heads talk about their favorite music, interview the "greatest musicians" of the genre (maybe "most influential" would be better word choice), and answer questions, like "where are they now".  I think this week was supposed to be those great 20th century philosophers, Poison ("Every Rose Has Its Thorn"), but might be a Ronnie James Dio tribute, since he died earlier this year. 

I'm not sure when it happened (perhaps when MTV stopped playing music) but somewhere along the way, I turned into a VH1 person.  They play music I know and like, as opposed to everything I complained about in a recent post.

Here we are now, entertain us

Later on, in the middle of the night, 120 Minutes comes on, so I'll record that too. 

They make good background noise when I'm reading or cleaning the house.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Weekend Football Picks

College

MICHIGAN STATE -7 over Illinois
Texas +9.5 over NEBRASKA
Arkansas +4 over AUBURN
Iowa -3 over MICHIGAN
South Carolina -4.5 over KENTUCKY
WISCONSIN -3.5 over Ohio State
ALABAMA -21 over Mississippi

Last week: 3-3
Overall: 7-10

NFL

Seattle +7.5 over CHICAGO
HOUSTON -4 over Kansas City
Detroit +11 over NY GIANTS
New Orleans -3 over TAMPA BAY
GREEN BAY -3.5 over Miami
NEW ENGLAND -1.5 over Baltimore
Cleveland +15 over PITTSBURGH
PHILADELPHIA -1 over Atlanta
ST. LOUIS +9 over San Diego
NY Jets -3 over DENVER
Oakland +7 over SAN FRANCISCO
MINNESOTA 0 over Dallas
Indianapolis -3 over WASHINGTON
Tennessee +2.5 over JACKSONVILLE

Last week: 8-5-1
Overall: 24-18-1

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Fixing the BCS

The BCS is flawed because it excludes deserving teams from championship and BCS bowl games. 

The BCS should institute a "+1 playoff format" and eliminate automatic bids to six conference champions.

Most college football fans hate the BCS.  A common view among fans is, "drop the 'C' and that about covers it".  Popular sports media fuel anti-BCS sentiment.  While fans don't like the BCS, and argue for a playoff system, the BCS claims it does what it is intended to do; and does it very well.  

Meanwhile, the first BCS rankings of this season will be released on October 17.  So let the controversy begin (especially if Boise State is #1). 

What is the BCS?


According to their web site, "The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) is a five-game showcase of college football.  It is designed to ensure that the two top-rated teams in the country meet in the national championship game, and to create exciting and competitive matchups among eight other highly regarded teams in four other bowl games."  The BCS has gone through revisions over the years, attempting to improve the product.  The BCS National Championship Game was introduced for the 2006-2007 season.

Two missions:

1.  "ensure that the two top-rated teams in the country meet in the national championship game."


The two best teams played for the championship last season, with #1 Alabama defeating #2 Texas to win the BCS National Championship.  The top two teams in the final BCS rankings have met all 12 years of its existence, so, mission accomplished. 

Don't forget that strict conference to bowl affiliations that existed prior to the BCS would have prevented most #1 vs. #2 bowl matchups.  That never solved anything, and often created a "mythical national champion" and one or more teams that felt like they were equally deserving.  There were also split national championships. 

Bowl rivalries, like Big 10 vs. PAC 10 in the Rose Bowl, can be preserved under the current BCS, but are trumped by placing the top two teams in the national championship game. 

2.  "create exciting and competitive matchups...in four other bowl games."

Last season, teams ranked #3 through #10 in the BCS met in the four other BCS bowl games.  And prior to the BCS, Boise State would have never played in a premier bowl.  They would have likely participated in the Humanitarian Bowl or Poinsettia Bowl every year.  That aspect of the equation has been improved under the BCS.  More on this later.  

So, the BCS does exactly what it's supposed to do, right?  In addition, it promotes urgency for the regular season games, preserves the bowl structure, and rakes in cash. 

There is also a whole page of testimonials supporting the event.  

What they're saying

Buried at the bottom of a BCS web page is their position on a playoff system,

"The NCAA membership has not voted for the creation of a playoff. Given that context, the conferences created the BCS in order to match the top two teams in a bowl game while maintaining the importance of the regular season and preserving the bowl system."

Pretty convincing, huh?  So the BCS and the bowl format aren't as bad as we thought and probably aren't going anywhere, right?  Let's look at the counterpoint.

Fixing the BCS

The BCS is flawed because it is not a playoff and it excludes deserving teams from championship and BCS bowl games. 

As noted above, the BCS has enabled teams that would not have otherwise had an opportunity to play in major bowls.  It limits those opportunities by rewarding conference champions without regard for their record and BCS standing. 

An expanded playoff system will probably never occur, at least in my lifetime.  A more fitting solution is a "+1 playoff format".  This involves a playoff system, but doesn't dramatically change the existing bowl structure.  Add one bowl to the BCS rotation, in order to maintain the amount of teams making it to BCS bowls. 

Match the top four ranked teams in two of the bowls, rotating theses bowls every season.  The two bowl winners go on the the BCS Championship Game.  This preserves the bowls and the basic BCS structure, but also becomes a four team playoff.  The "+1 playoff format" means that only the two finalists play one more game than the current format.  One more week of travel for two teams and their supporters is an acceptable price for a four team championship tournament.    

The other major flaw in the current BCS is that six of the 10 spots in the BCS are reserved for conference champions.  These automatic bids should be eliminated entirely, or at least become conditional, upon the conference champion not having four losses or being ranked outside of the BCS top 15.  This will involve reassessing how revenues are distributed amongst conferences.  Since 2002, three four-loss ACC champions have made it into the BCS, by virtue of winning an inferior conference championship and securing an automatic bid.  The automatic bids squeezed out more deserving teams.

In 2005, 8-4 Florida State went to the Orange Bowl, while Oregon, 10-1, who only lost to #1 USC, did not earn a BCS bid. 

In 2008, Virginia Tech (9-4) went to the Orange Bowl. 10-2 TCU defeated 12-0 Boise State in the Poinsettia Bowl.    

The NCAA is going to be motivated by generating revenue, and the current system does that.  A "+1 playoff format" would be about the only way NCAA membership might vote to incorporate a playoff.  Much of the current bowl structure would be preserved.  One more game would actually mean more money.  And we all know that money is what motivates all the current changes going on in college sports. 

Until a "+1 playoff format" is instituted, and the BCS stops rewarding four-loss conference champions, this is as good as it's going to get.
 
 

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Poker Tip #3: How to bet

This post is strictly limited to the mechanics of how to place a bet.  Basic betting strategy, including how much is the right amount to bet, will be covered in Poker Tip #4.

When it is your turn, the option is yours, depending on the situation, to fold, open with a bet, call an existing bet, or raise. 

Folding:

Folding is easy.  All I can say is fold your cards to where the dealer can reach them.  And do not expose your cards if the hand is still being contested. 

I was sitting in a seat away from the dealer in a game at Foxwoods, and had gotten into the habit of folding my cards with a light toss or slide precisely into the dealer's muck pile.  An opponent said, "you're really good at folding", meaning he liked how I tossed the cards and that they ended up in the right spot.  My reply was, "thank you, I've had a lot of practice". 

If you play a lot of casino poker, it's not as exciting all the time as it looks on tv (they edit the footage).  Be prepared to do a lot of folding and waiting to be selectively aggressive.   

What constitutes a betting action:

Different casinos and dealers have different rules.  Generally, if you release chips past your cards or the betting line circling the table, it is considered a bet.  When making a bet, call, or raise, there are a few ways to do it properly. 

Bets should be made in front of the player and ahead of the player's "capped" cards.  Place the chips ahead of the betting line circling the table, if one exists.  That will constitute a bet and the dealer can easily reach the chips. Occasionally players set chips out ahead of their cards to count them, without realizing that it can be considered a bet. 

Any verbal declaration, such as "call" or "all in" is binding.
When placing a bet, do not confuse your current bet with money already in the pot.  People do this sometimes in home games.
 
Betting and calling:

1.  Verbally declare "I bet" or "call" when it is your turn to act.  Then go to your chip stack to get the amount you want to bet or call.  If you do not have the exact amount in chips, the dealer will make change.  I keep track in case the dealer gets distracted and does not return my change after raking the pot.

2.  Simply put the amount of the bet or call into the pot without saying a word.  An "overchip" (single chip of greater value than the bet) is considered a call unless it is declared a raise by the player.  So, if the bet is $30 and I simply place a $100 chip out without declaring a raise, it is considered a call.
 
Raising:

1.  Verbally declare “raise”, then put out the amount to cover the previous bet and what you decide to raise in one motion.

2.  Don’t say a word, just put out chips equal to the amount of the previous bet and your raise in one motion.  Least preferred because sometimes the dealer and other players don’t notice you’ve raised, yet some people do it.

3.  Verbally declare “raise“.  In one motion, put out the previous bet.  In one additional motion, put out the amount you choose to raise.

4.  Verbally declare “raise” and verbally declare the amount of the raise or the total bet.  Take as many motions as necessary to count out and put your chips in the pot. 

So, if you're opening with a bet, or making a call, it is fine just to put the proper amount out  If you decide to raise, verbally declaring your intentions helps keep the game going because the dealer and other players know exactly what you're doing. 

String bets:

String bets, bets where a player does not make all of the intended bet in one statement or motion, are not permitted in most settings.  They are often accidental, but deceive opponents as to the player's intent, and can be used to gather tells. 

Examples are to say "I call your bet, and raise you $20", or betting in multiple motions.  The dealer will probably rule that you called the original bet and can not raise. 
As with my tip about protecting your hand, watch how players place their bets in a casino or on tv, and you'll see what I mean.

Also, don't splash the pot.  The punishment is you'll probably have to endure some bad Rounders impressions. 

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Boston Bruins Actually Spend Some Money

Maybe you noticed that hockey season has begun; maybe not.  In the case if the Boston Bruins and Phoenix Coyotes, it commenced today in Prague, Czech Republic.  The B's are down 1-0 at the first intermission.  What I find amazing, is the Bruins are actually spending some money these days to keep a good team together.

Bruins ink Chara to seven-year contract extension

Bergeron gets 3-year/$15M extension

This is a welcome change from, well, the history of the Boston Bruins. 

Last year's team was a Stanley Cup contender, but suffered a historic, "Yankee-like" collapse in the playoffs against the Philadelphia Flyers.  Offense is still the weakness, but re-signing key players, and some new additions, like #2 overall pick, Tyler Seguin, will make them a contender for the next few seasons. 

"Anything is possible," Bruins captain Zdeno Chara said. "We have a good enough team to win all the way. If we stay healthy, yeah, this team is very strong." (link)

Agreed.

If you want a real hockey preview, this isn't it.  I'm sure there are plenty out there.  I'm just saying that it's nice to see the notoriously cheap Bruins spend to keep a talented team together.  They've usually been more interested in not spending, and the cheap alternative, then pursuing championships.  Lest we forget, this is the franchise that traded Joe Thornton in the middle of his MVP season.

I'm finally convinced that these Bruins are different.

So wake me up when it's playoff time.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Andrew W.K. The Weather Man - Fox News

And now your local weather forecast.

Check This Out: Charlie Davies

One year ago, Charlie Davies almost died in a fatal car accident.  His many injuries prevented him from playing in the 2010 World Cup.  Today, he is working his way back to professional soccer.

Update:

There's a report Davies was pulled over in France last week, for driving 125mph. (link)

Update #2:

Davies says he was not driving.  (link)

Ok, I'm done with this story.

Weekend Watching

Texas A&M vs. Arkansas (2:30PM, CT) on ABC.  At a baby shower.

Many people schedule important events so as not to conflict with their alma mater or favorite college football team's games.  Or else they face ridicule from their friends.  Nobody wants to be at a wedding or shower and unable to watch the big game.  If it were me, I'd just wait until the bye week, or even better, the offseason.  Sometimes that's not practical. 

There is another way.  Incorporate the big game into the event.  That's what's going on Saturday.  Some friends are expecting a baby in December.  So, I'll watch the Texas A&M - Arkansas football game at a baby shower.  The invitation reads more like, "we're having a party for the football game; and by the way, it's a baby shower too."  I'm guessing the gifts come after the game.  I think they all want it to be that way.

Baby shower.  Party.  Football game.  I can do that.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Book Review: The Lovely Bones

I finished reading The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold last night.  I was aware of the premise beforehand, because people mentioned the movie, directed by Peter Jackson.  It features Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, and Susan Sarandon.  I have not seen the movie yet, so I am writing without that perspective. 

I will reveal plot elements if you chooses to read on.

The Lovely Bones follows a 14 year old girl, Susie Salmon; as she is growing up, is raped and murdered, and lives on, in heaven and in the memories of those close to her.  It begins as a terrific murder-mystery, but charts a course different than I expected, or would have preferred.  I was expecting the murder-mystery to continue, and evolve into a revenge plot, perhaps a race to stop the killer from murdering again.  I wanted  plot elements that never occurred, namely discovery of the body and revenge against the murderer.   

Instead, the story becomes a psychological study of the different characters.  We read how a young girl in heaven moves on, following a life horrifically ended too soon.  Family and friends deal with the murder, as well as each other - this becomes the driving force as the story progresses.  There is insight into the mind of a serial killer; also, the lead detective as he searches, but is ultimately unable to find answers.  There are moments of suspense, strong connection between the living and deceased, a few head scratchers, and a hasty conclusion. 

Sebold was motivated by circumstances in her life.  Many years later, she created fiction out of events that are all too real for her.   Sebold employs a notion that heaven is a personally defined space.  Another's heaven will be different, but may overlap with Susie's in certain areas. 

The book did not evolve the way I wanted, however it is the domain of its author.  It is her story, not mine.  The best authors tell a story and allow the reader to apply their own meaning and interpretation.  Sebold does a fine job, as the imagery is one of the novel's greatest strengths. We all read the same words on the page, but my picture of the neighborhood and of the sinkhole, which contains Susie's remains, is different from another readers, or that of the film.

The resolution is a reminder that not everything turns out as we would like it to.  In the end, the murderer will never kill again, the living are moving forward with their lives, and a teenage girl resides in heaven. 

It is a good book.  I was just looking for something different.

If you enjoy this book, others that come to mind that you may consider are The Five People You Meet Heaven, by Mitch Albom, and The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon, by Stephen King.  Alice Sebold has written two other novels, Lucky: A Memoir and The Almost Moon.   

Weekend Football Picks

College

Tennessee +11 over GEORGIA
ARKANSAS -5.5 over Texas A&M (at Cowboys Stadium)
Alabama -6.5 over SOUTH CAROLINA
Louisiana State (LSU) +6 over FLORIDA
Southern Cal (USC) +10 over STANFORD
MIAMI -6.5 over Florida State

Last Week: 4-2
Overall: 4-7

NFL

Chicago -1.5 over CAROLINA
Atlanta -2.5 over CLEVELAND
NY Giants +2.5 over HOUSTON
Green Bay -2.5 over WASHINGTON
Jacksonville 0 over BUFFALO
Tampa Bay +7 over CINCINNATI
St. Louis +2.5 over DETROIT
INDIANAPOLIS -8 over Kansas City
BALTIMORE -7 over Denver
New Orleans -7 over ARIZONA
Tennessee +7 over DALLAS
San Diego -6 over OAKLAND
Philadelphia +3 over SAN FRANCISCO
Minnesota +3 over NY JETS

Last Week: 7-6
Overall: 16-13

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

In hindsight

This is what I didn't say, didn't know, or happened subsequent to my most recent posts. 

1.  Kissing Suzy Kolber has a lot of funny running jokes, including one about Chad Ochocinco and Bengals coach, Marvin Lewis.  The most recent entry is, What Happens When You Call Ocho’s Phone Sex Line? (NSFW)

2.  The incident that inspired the name "Kissing Suzy Kolber" is one of the funniest moments in the history of television. 

3.  The Supreme Court is hearing a case based upon Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals.  This is an extremely interesting case.  I can't move off the view that as despicable as the actions of the protesters are, they are protected by the First Amendment.  How does this balance with privacy rights, places and times when protests are regulated, and responsibility for the results of one's speech?  Free speech exists, but certain content such as slander and yelling "fire" in a movie theatre will get you in trouble.  I am interested in how the court rules.

4.  The Ryder Cup was something special.  There were some great performances.  It was decided on the final singles match, with Graeme McDowell defeating Hunter Mahan to win it for the Europeans. 

5.  I had never watched Jersey Shore.  Stopped for about one minute when I saw it was on the other day.  I'm pretty sure that nose picking constitutes foreplay in the Jersey Shore.  My curiosity is satisfied.  I've seen enough.

6.  They say pitching wins championships.  I hope so, because my World Series picks (Phillies and Rays) had some serious hitting problems over the course of the season. 

7.  Apparently, I now take submissions.  They will be posted under the heading, "put this in your blog and smoke it".  It made me take the time (approx. 2 minutes) to learn how to add pictures and videos.

8.  "Four Days In October" was a good documentary.  Liked the camcorder footage. 

9.  It didn't take long to reveal my loyalties are to the New England sports teams.  Too much going on not to comment.  I will try not to focus too heavily on it.  No, I didn't just become a Liverpool fan.

10.  Texas and Florida are two of the most overrated college football teams this season.  They simply lost too much talent from last year.  Betting against them helped redeem my college football picks.  Moving the picks from Friday to Thursday, as suggested. 

11.  Oregon's win over Stanford was a fun college football game to watch.  Alabama and Oregon are the two best teams in the country right now, and the national championship match up I would most like to see.

12.  Not sure if I can or should keep up the theme of song lyrics as column titles.  My guess is that it has been done before (and probably better).  I have seen articles centered around movie quotes, but there is no intent to steal unattributed content or ideas.

Links

1.  The Patriots trade Randy Moss to the Minnesota Vikings for a 3rd round draft pick

2.  Red Sox ownership has agreed to purchase Liverpool FC

3.  The US Supreme Court is hearing a case regarding protests at military funerals

4.  The baseball playoffs begin today

5.  Will it be Obama-Clinton in 2012?

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

"Four Days In October"

ESPN is showing "Four Days In October" tonight (8pm EST), as part of the documentary series "30 for 30".

"30 for 30" contains some of the best sports documentaries ever made.  This one is particularly interesting because I know the story so well.  It is the greatest moment I'll ever have as a sports fan.  #2 is reserved for the USA winning the World Cup.  I can hope, but it probably will not happen in my lifetime.  

The night prior to our story, Red Sox lost game 3, 19-8. The loss meant they were down 3-0 against the Yankees in the 2004 ALCS.  They were on the verge of being eliminated by the Yankees for the second year in a row.  The 2003 ALCS was particularly cruel because of the way it ended, and because I believed the Red Sox were the better team.  We had our shot, and blew it. 

2004 was to become a different story.  It would be the Yankees who had their shot and blew it.

Kentucky Fried Kevin
Before game 4 of the ALCS, the first of the four nights, I remember sharing precisely the same thoughts as Red Sox resident clairvoyant, Kevin Millar. 

"Don't let the Red Sox win this game." 

I held the same hope, for the same reasons.  If Derek Lowe could get us through game 4, the Yankees would have to defeat Pedro Martinez or Curt Schilling (would become the "bloody sock game").  Pedro is the best pitcher I have ever seen; Schilling, one of the best of his generation.  And, as we learned the year before, anything can happen if the Red Sox can just make it to a game 7.

During "Four Days In October", the Red Sox accomplished the most unlikely of comebacks, winning four straight games to go to the World Series.  The World Series was almost anti-climactic, as the Red Sox swept the St. Louis Cardinals to win their first championship since 1918.  When that game ended, not a moment earlier, I removed the bottle of Dom from the refrigerator to celebrate.

The Red Sox won the World Series again in 2007.  It was a great moment, not the same as 2004.  Then, the Mitchell Report was released, casting a shadow over the whole generation of baseball.  Today, the Red Sox are no longer considered the lovable losers.  Like the Yankees, Celtics and Patriots, winning has become the expectation.  Fans take success for granted.  Those who are not fans of the teams turn against them, rooting for the new underdog.  Please let anybody but them win. 

Not in 2004.  Nothing will ever be like those "Four Days In October".

You know I'm a dreamer, but my heart's of gold

I've never been good at remembering my dreams.  I remember them occasionally. 

In my dreams, I may be climbing a cliff, running through dense forest, playing poker, or being chased by lions while hyenas laugh at me (yup, that's right).  They may include my mother, who passed away over 10 years ago, or be set in the town where I grew up, and left after high school.  The dreams I remember seem to fit common symbols and archetypes.  There are logical reasons why they occurred.

I had two dreams that included cake this week; not a surprise that my birthday is coming up.  In one of those dreams, I taunted Shaquille O'Neal for throwing a football like a girl.  Perhaps I am concerned because he is long past his prime and has other interests besides basketball.  Perhaps I never cared before, but now he is playing for my favorite basketball team, the Boston Celtics.

Nice bow tie.

I figure that if I ever want to pursue becoming a serious writer, the way to begin is by keeping a bedside notebook and doing a better job documenting my dreams.  Anyone reading this knows I am not a serious writer.

For now, I'll just settle for the pen and paper that I use to write down ideas for this blog.  

AC Milan vs Parma 1-0 - HD Andrea Pirlo Long Range Crazy Goal 1-0 - 02/...

Nice goal by Andrea Pirlo.

Submitted with the heading "put this in your blog and smoke it."


Monday, October 4, 2010

MLB Playoffs

AL

Rays beat Rangers
Yankees beat Twins

Rays beat Yankees

NL

Phillies beat Reds
Braves beat Giants

Phillies beat Braves

World Series

Phillies beat Rays in seven games.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Here we are now, entertain us

About 10 years ago, a friend of mine said, "new music is mostly garbage because there is a dearth of good guitar players".  He is definitely what you'd call an audiophile, who especially loves the sound of his vintage record collection.  I agreed and we discussed, over many beers, selected facts that supported his point.  Around that time, another friend, within our group, commented that the only new music he likes is U2.  I said "oh, you mean the band that formed in the late 1970's?"

I don't have the focus or inclination to write a post that would give this topic proper treatment.  Instead, I'll say a couple of things, contradict myself, allow a contrary view the final word, and call it a day.

I know one song in the top 10 of the current Billboard Hot 100.  I have heard of many of the artists, and know some of their other songs. I am going to assume most new artists are corporate creations, and that people like Hannah Montana and the Jonas Brothers are not particularly talented.  I am not going to watch American Idol.

That being said, I like Robbie Williams and Justin Timberlake.  I very much enjoyed two Girl Talk concerts, even though the guy is a walking copyright infringement.  Not all rap is bad.  Just most of it.

So, maybe I am becoming more like my older friends, and closing my mind to new, and possibly good music.  In the car, there is an approximately 100% chance I am going to find the radio station that plays the old songs I know and like, instead of giving new music a fair chance.

With this in mind, take a minutes to peruse Blender Magazine's,

The 500 Greatest Songs Since You Were Born

I will give up the final word, since I am not actually trying to win an argument with myself.  I will also resist the temptation to quibble with the songs and the ordering.  Feel free to do that for yourself.   

"Blender has never bought the myth that rock & roll declined at middle age; the last 25 years were as good as the 25 before them, unless you somehow think Eminem and U2 aren’t as Genius Level as the Moody Blues and Captain & Tennille. So we’ve constructed an alternative rock history that begins long after Woodstock stopped smelling bad and the Sex Pistols quit with dignity, a list of the 500 greatest songs since 1980. And believe us, it was hard to stop at only 500. Sometimes, the good ol’ days were yesterday and today."

Poker Tip #2: Protect your hand

Whether you are playing in a casino or at the dining room table, it is important to protect your cards at all times.  Cards are dealt face down and should not be shown, purposely or accidentally, to an opponent until all betting has been completed.  Players should cup their hands over the cards so only they can see when they are looking at them.  The cards should not be picked up off the table.  Cards should then be "capped" by placing a poker chip or other card guard on top of them.  I memorize the rank and suit of my cards but it is ok to look back if necessary.  You can see players do this by watching poker on tv or in a casino.    


One of the best ways to get information in a poker game is when an opponents cards are reveled.  You can review how the hand was played, knowing the cards involved.  Players folding while there is action behind them should be careful not to expose their cards.  Sometimes friends or players sitting near one another show their cards when they fold or when one of the players is not in the hand.  The general rule is “show one, show all.”  If I see this and want to know what the exposed cards are, I ask the dealer to enforce the rule.  Occasionally, accidents happen.  If you accidentally expose cards when folding while the hand is still being played, just say “sorry” and move on.  


If I notice that a player is exposing their cards when they are looking at them, I generally tell them once.  I say that I am not purposely trying to see their hand, but sometimes I happen to be looking in their direction and see their cards.  It happens more than you might think, especially since I am following Poker Tip #1: Follow the actionIt’s each players responsibility to protect their hand.  


Live cards should be "capped" so they are not mistaken as dead cards and folded by the dealer.  Also, if another player folds, touching your uncovered cards, the dealer can rule your hand is dead.  I have seen this happen in large pots.  The seats next to the dealer are most susceptible because players further from the dealer are folding towards those positions. 


Example:  At the Gold Strike in Tunica, an older man acting before me consistently exposed his hand while looking at his cards.  I could look at him and see what he had before I acted during every hand.  I quietly said to him that I could see his cards when he looked at them, thinking he would appreciate the information and protect his hand better.  Later, he won a $1,000 pot with a KJ, making a straight.  After the hand, I quietly said "good hand" and again told him I could see his cards when he looked at them.  He grunted so I knew he heard me.  A couple of hands later, I wasn't getting anywhere, so I informed the dealer. 


I was in the middle of a big hand when the old man decided to reply by asking if he and I had a problem.  He said he would call the floor man or we could just take it outside.  He did so loud enough for the whole table to hear, and while I was playing a hand.  As I am raking in my own $1,000 pot, I turned to the dealer, repeated that the player was repeatedly exposing his cards.  I had told him multiple times, and I thought it would be a good idea to call the floor man.


I shouldn't have done this next part.  It is out of character, but I do not like people who are disrespectful to other players and to the game.  I have very few conflicts at a poker table, however the old man was not only wrong, he thought he could talk down to me. 


When the floor arrived, I embarrassed the old man so thoroughly that anyone at the surrounding tables could hear.  I said that it was unfair to all players for me to see his cards, he ruined the integrity of the game, and someone playing in casino for money should be able to protect his hand properly.  I pointed out that I had politely said something twice and would not tolerate being disrespected by somebody who did not follow the rules of the game.  The dealer concurred, and the floor man instructed the old man to protect his hand. 


I wish he had not left within 15 minutes.  I apologized to the table for running the old man off because he was the easy money you want to keep at the table.  I wonder what would have happened if I had not attempted to be polite, and instead just played every hand knowing the old man's cards.  I'm pretty sure I know the answer.  Had he had stayed, he probably would have been separated from all of his chips.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Sorry 'bout that

The United States apologized today for intentionally infecting Guatemalans with sexually transmitted diseases in the 1940's.  This is similar to known studies performed on African-Americans in Alabama, or by Germans during the Holocaust. 

Today, we could accomplish the same thing by filming the next season of Jersey Shore in Guatemala.

Seriously, you'd like to think these atrocities do not happen anymore, but I'm sure they do - by governments and companies against humans as well as animals.

Weekend Watching

I certainly won't watch it all, but I will pay attention to The Ryder Cup, starting today.  The Ryder Cup is a team golf event matching the USA against Europe.  It is played every other year, and alternating venues between the USA and Europe.  This year's Ryder Cup is being contested at Celtic Manor in South Wales.

Normally, golf is an individual sport, where one plays for and by oneself.  Professionals, and some country clubbers, rely on a caddie to carry their bags and provide guidance, but the game is played individually.  The Ryder Cup asks the best golfers in the world to play for and as a team.  There are foursomes, fourballs, and singles play; each match offering one point to win, lose or split.  The team with the most cumulative points wins the Cup.

I rarely watch golf and stopped playing in college.  I tell people I gave it up because it was too easy, but that has probably never happened in the history of man.  I'll watch some of the Masters and the Ryder Cup, but that's about it. 

I have attended golf tournaments twice (at East Lake and Sugarloaf) and, in both cases, had a great time.  I highly recommend going if you have an opportunity.  Watching the best in the world make a difficult game look easy (but sometimes they look just like the rest of us), and seeing the landscaping and layout of the golf course make for a good day.  Watching Tiger Woods drive a golf ball while I stood 10 feet away (then getting him to chuckle at a joke as he headed to the tee-side porta john) rates as a unique experience.  Both times, beer was available to the gallery.

I am also interested in anything representing a high level of international competition, where the competitors are motivated by playing for their country (or, in Ryder Cup, continent).  To be on the Ryder Cup team, golfers accumulate points based on performance leading up to the event.  Eight qualify, and four are chosen by team captains, making for 12 man teams.  Players are honored to earn a spot on their Ryder Cup squad. 

I root for Americans to win.  I root for all to perform well, regardless of nationality.  Same with the Olympics, World Cup, FIBA Championships, and other international competitions.  I want to see something special.  The Ryder Cup is not routine, like a normal four round golf tournament or a 162 game baseball season.  The spectators tell you all you need to know.  That it's the best golfers in the world playing as a team for a title they truly care about.  It is a chance to see something special. 

And yes, Tiger Woods is playing.

Free Online Courses: Open Culture

Open Culture touts itself as "the best free cultural & educational media on the web".  The web site sets itself apart from a lot of what you will find while mindlessly surfing the web.  They combine intellectual content and pop culture in an informative and entertaining format.  According to the site, Open Culture is the product of Dan Coleman, Director and Associate Dean of Stanford's Continuing Studies Program, though not directly associated with the university.

Open Culture pursues educational content, unique intellectual stories, and adds narrative and videos for the viewer.  Open Culture is interested in topics from Puppet making with Jim Henson to Einstein’s E = mc2 Explained.  In addition, they provide a list of free online courses for readers to pursue.  It appeals to the PBS crowd, which I would say describes me to some degree. 

I have been working on a Yale economics course and Stanford Mini Med School lecture series.  Both are well done recordings of university lectures.  The Yale economics course on Game Theory includes blackboard notes, homework assignments and examinations.  I am simply auditing the Stanford lectures.  Since the product is so well done, I am capable of drawing as much from the online experience as students who are fortunate enough to attend.  I probably would not have stumbled upon the opportunity were it not for Open Culture.   

Open Culture and the content it links to are quality products and excellent resources available to those who want to use the internet for learning.  Thank you for all the terrific information. 

Weekend Football Picks

College

OKLAHOMA -3 over Texas
Wisconsin -2 over MICHIGAN STATE
Tennessee +16.5 over LSU
Notre Dame -2.5 over BOSTON COLLEGE
Stanford +7 over OREGON
ALABAMA -8 over Florida

Last week: nevermind

NFL

NY Jets -5.5 over BUFFALO
GREEN BAY -15.5 over Detroit
Baltimore +1 over PITTSBURGH
Denver +7 over TENNESSEE
San Francisco +7.5 over ATLANTA
Cincinnati -3 over CLEVELAND
NEW ORLEANS -15 over Carolina
Houston -3 over OAKLAND
Indianapolis -8 over JACKSONVILLE
PHILADELPHIA -5.5 over Washington
Arizona +9 over SAN DIEGO
NY GIANTS -4 over Chicago
New England 0 over MIAMI

Last Week: 9-7